Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Praveen Kumar Pandey vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 October, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 19372 of 2005 Petitioner :- Praveen Kumar Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- A.P. Kushwaha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,R.K. Srivastava Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following relief:
"(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents that they may permit the petitioner to continue training course of special B.T.C. and also permit to the petitioner to make their signature on the attendance register and after training give the proper appointment in respective institutions."
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting relief, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 26.10.2018
Manish Himwan
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Praveen Kumar Pandey vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 October, 2018
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • A P Kushwaha