Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Praveen K S Naik vs Krishnanaik And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|18 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE:
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION No.29823/2017 (GM – CPC) BETWEEN:
PRAVEEN K S NAIK S/O D SHANKAR AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS ASST. PROFESSOR, MAHARAJA COLLEGE MYSORE R/O TANDY VILLAGE LAKKAVALLI HOBLI TARIKERE TALUK CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT- 577 101 REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA HOLDER D.SHANKAR S/O DOODYANAIK AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS OCCUPATION AGRICULTURIST R/AT TANDY VILLAGE LAKKAVALLI HOBLI TARIKERE TALUK CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT- 577 101 [BY SRI RAVI H K., ADV.] AND:
1. KRISHNANAIK S/O PUTTANAIK, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS 2. SHAKUNTHALA W/O KRISHNANAIAK AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS ... PETITIONER 3. RAVINAIAK S/O RAMANAIAK, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS 4. CHANDRIKA W/O RAVINAIK AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS 5. SHEKHARNAIK S/O KRISHNANAIK, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS THE RESPONDENTS 1 TO 5 ARE R/O KARAKUCHI VILLAGE, LAKKAVALLI HOBLI, TARIKERE TALUK- 577 101 6. SANJU S/O SOMLANAIK, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS R/O SODLIPURA VILLAGE LAKKAVALLI HOBLI TARIKERE TALUK PIN - 577101 …RESPONDENTS [BY SRI K R KUMAR, ADV. FOR R-1 & R-2 R-3 TO R-5 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED: 16.06.2017 AT ANNEXURE-F PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND PRL. JMFC, TARIKERE IN M.A.NO.4/2016 CONFIRMING THE ORDER DATED: 18.02.2016 VIDE ANNEXURE-E PASSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. JMFC, TARIKERE ON I.A. No.2 FILED UNDER ORDER XXXIX RULE 1 AND 2 OF CPC IN OS No. 265/2015 FILED BY THE PETITIONER AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R This writ petition is filed against the order dated 18.02.2016 on I.A.No.2 in O.S.No.265/2015 on the file of the Civil Judge and Additional JMFC at Tarikere ['Trial Court' for short].
2. It is discerned that the said O.S. No.265/2015 has been disposed of by the Trial Court and hence, writ petition does not survive for consideration.
In view of the aforesaid, writ petition stands dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE PMR
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Praveen K S Naik vs Krishnanaik And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
18 February, 2019
Judges
  • S Sujatha