Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Pramod Kumar And Others vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 July, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 21
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1105 of 2021 Petitioner :- Pramod Kumar And 4 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bajrang Lal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rameshwar Prasad Shukla
Hon'ble Dinesh Pathak,J.
Heard Shri Bajrang Lal, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel and perused the record.
Instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner in the nature of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) beseeching mandamus commanding respondent authorities to remove the illegal encroachment made by respondent nos.5 to 8 over Gata No.3031 area 1.175 acre (New Gata No.1108 area 0.4760 hectare) and Gata No.3013 area 0.185 acre (New Gata No.1300 area 0.035 acre) situate in village Peuwatal, Tehsil Ghosi,r District Mau.
It is submitted that aforesaid land in question is recorded as "Pond" in the Revenue record. Respondent Nos.5 to 8 have illegally encroached upon the land in question, without any legal right and title, otherwise than in accordance with the law, which is causing inconvenience to the public in large. It is further submitted that petitioner has filed representation dated 10.03.2021 (annexure no.4) before the authorities concerned to ventilate his grievances qua illegal encroachment made by respondent Nos.5 to 8 over the plot in question as mentioned above.
Grievance of the petitioner is that despite the representation dated 10.03.2021, having been submitted, till date no effective measures have been taken by the authorities concerned to remove the illegal encroachment made by respondent Nos.5 to 8 over the plot in question, to either initiate a proceeding under the relevant provisions of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 or reject the application filed by the petitioner. It is thus urged that not taking any action against the encroachment over the public property amounts omission from legal obligation entrusted upon the officer concerned under the law.
Learned Standing Counsel, however, contended that petitioner has an alternative and efficacious remedy to move an application under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, with respect to his grievances as made in the present writ petition.
In this conspectus as above, no useful purpose would be served to keep this matter pending, therefore, this court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition filed in the nature of public interest litigation (PIL), without making any observation on the merits of the case as mentioned in the writ petition, with a direction that petitioner is at liberty to move fresh representation, within period of three weeks from today, qua his grievances as mentioned in the present writ petition along with copy of this order before the Tahsildar, Tahsil-Ghonsi, District-Mau (respondent no.3), who shall take action and initiate legal proceeding under the relevant provisions of U.P. Revenue code, 2006 read with U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 and conclude the same in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably, within the period of three months from the date in receipt of the aforesaid representation.
The petitioner shall file a computer generated copy of this order downloaded from the official website of High Court, Allahabad, supported by an affidavit, which shall be verified by the concerned authority from the website of the High Court, Allahabad.
With the aforesaid observations, this petition is finally disposed of.
Order Date :- 27.7.2021 Zafar
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Pramod Kumar And Others vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 July, 2021
Judges
  • Dinesh Pathak
Advocates
  • Bajrang Lal