IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR CRL.P No.7701/2018 BETWEEN:
1. PRAKASH RAJARAM CHOUDHARY S/O. RAJARAM CHOUDHARY AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS FLAT NO.21, MARKAL ROAD ALANDI DEVACHI TALUK PUNE DISTRICT – 412 105.
2. SURESH POOJARY S/O NANAIAH POOJARY AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS RESIDING AT, MORISHKA PALACE 103, ‘B’ BLOCK, KADRI KAMBLA MANGALORE – 575 003.
3. SANDEEP SHETTY S/O VIJAY SHETTY AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS NO.5-221, B.V. BALIGA COMPOUND NEAR ITI BEJAI POST MANGALORE – 575 004.
4. JEEVAN JOIL ARANNA S/O SOORAPPA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS CHANDRAPURA VILLAGE MUDIGERE TALUK CHIKAMANGALURU DISTRICT.
5. JEEVAN NELSON PINTO S/O JOSEPH PINTO NO.3-123, PERMANKI HOUSE ULLALBETTU MANGALORE KARNATAKA – 574 145.
6. B.M. RAVIRAJ S/O LATE MANJAPPACHARY AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.39 6TH CROSS, NAVODAYA SCHOOL ROAD VIDYARANYAPURA POST SINGAPORE BENGALURU – 560 092.
... PETITIONERS (BY SMT. RADHA Y – ADVOCATE FOR SRI L. HARISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND :
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY SHESHADRIPURAM POLICE & CCB REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING BANGALORE – 560 001.
2. MR. L.K. RAMESH POLICE INSPECTOR OFFICE OF ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE CCB, F & B SQUAD N. T. PETE (NEW THARAGUPETE) BENGALURU – 560 002.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. K.P. YASHODHA – HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS INITIATED AGAINST THE PETITIONERS ANNEXURE-B IN CRIME NO.93/2017 (CRIME NO. 93/2017 OF SESHADRIPURAM POLICE STATION) ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED I – ADDITIONAL C.M.M., AT BANGALORE..
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER ` Smt. Radha Y., learned advocate for Sri L. Harish Kumar, learned advocate appearing for the petitioners has filed a Memo of even date stating that the police after investigation have filed ‘B’ report, hence this petition is rendered infructuous and accordingly prayed for its dismissal.
2. Memo is placed on record. The petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous.
3. In view of dismissal of the petition, I.A.No.1/2018 does not survive for consideration and it is also dismissed.
No costs.
Sd/- JUDGE SBS* CT:bm