Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Prakash Chand vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 August, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 9
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 24394 of 2019 Petitioner :- Prakash Chand Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satish Kumar Pandey,Anil Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Amresh Singh
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Vakalatnama filed by Sri S.K. Sharma, Advocate, on behalf of respondent No.5. The same is taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.1, 2, 3 and 5 and Sri Amresh Singh, learned counsel for respondent Nos.4, 6 and 7.
On 26.07.2019 following order was passed:-
"Heard.
Petitioner seeks the following relief:-
(I) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no.3 to execute/comply the order dated 20.5.2019 passed in Case No. 1342/2019 (computerized Case No. T201912070601342 (Prakash Chand Vs. Natthu Singh and others) U/s 134 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006."
In paragraph 11 of the writ petition, it has been stated that order under Section 131 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 is appealable within 30 days. No appeal has been filed. The order, though final, has not been given effect to. Learned Standing Counsel is directed to obtain instructions in the matter.
Put up as fresh on 09.08.2019."
Today when the matter is taken up, instructions received by learned Standing Counsel was placed before the Court.
It is stated by learned Standing Counsel on the basis of instructions that in compliance of the order passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate Bisli Budaun/respondent No.3 dated 20.05.2019, proceedings were initiated by the revenue authorities. Thereafter, private respondent Nos.5 to 7 namely Nattu Singh, Dinesh and Biresh respectively were evicted from the plot in question and the possession of the aforesaid plots have already been provided to the petitioner.
In view of the same, it is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he does not want to press this writ petition.
In the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the statement made by learned Standing Counsel for the petitioner at Bar, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Order Date :- 26.8.2019/saqlain
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Prakash Chand vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 August, 2019
Judges
  • Prakash Padia
Advocates
  • Satish Kumar Pandey Anil Kumar