Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Corporation, apart from perusing the record. Since the issue lies in a narrow compass, this Court proposes to dispose of the writ petition at the admission stage itself. 2. The petitioner, an Empanelled Conductor, made enquiries with the respondent authorities when he was not alloted duties subsequent to 07.02.2014. The authorities revealed to him that he faced a charge of consuming liquor along with certain other workmen within the premises of the depot to which he had been assigned. In that respect, the petitioner filed Exhibit P3 representation before the first respondent. Complaining of its non disposal, he filed the present writ petition.
3. In the facts and circumstances, having regard to the respective submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner W.P.(c) No. 28430 of 2014 2 and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent corporation, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court disposes of the present writ petition with a direction to the first respondent to consider Exhibit P3 representation of the petitioner in accordance with law, and pass appropriate orders thereon as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
With the above observation, this writ petition is disposed of.
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU JUDGE DMR/-