Heard learned advocates for the parties.
Learned advocate Mr. Asim Pandya at the outset submits that applicants No. 1 and 2 had no domestic relationship with aggrieved person and, therefore, they are not to be joined as respondent which again defines the nature of respondent to be joined in. At the same time respondent Nos. 3 and 4 are rank outsiders and having no remote connection with the alleged relationship as defined under Section 2
(f) and (q) the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. It is therefore, submitted that impugned complaint qua them deserves to be quashed and set aside.
Learned advocate for the aggrieved persons, the complainant would submit that necessary averments are made in the complaint and earlier the applicants No. 1 and 2/respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in the complaint filed under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 were residing with complainant and her husband and further in a day to day life of the complainant and her husband interference of applicants No. 1 and 2 continued.
Prima facie, however, the above submissions of learned advocate for the complainant would not attract any ingredients of Section 2(f) and (g) of Act of 2005 and, therefore, ad-interim relief granted to continue as interim relief till further order qua the applicants herein only.
[ANANT S. DAVE, J.] //smita// Top