Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Pradeep vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 May, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 22
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 20436 of 2018 Applicant :- Pradeep Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Dhirendra Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard Sri D.K. Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.
Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that according to prosecution case the applicant along with co-accused Mukesh had forcibly lifted the prosecutrix Km. Priti over their motorcycle. The prosecutrix in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. (Annexure-6) has made allegation of indecent behaviour against co-accused Mukesh. He next submitted that applicant and innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with some ulterior motive. He further submitted that bare reading of the statement of the prosecutrix would go to show that no offence under SC/ST Act is made out against the petitioner. He lastly submitted that the applicant has no criminal history. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 30.4.2018.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case.
Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant Pradeep involved in Case Crime No. 16/18, under Sections 354(A), 354(B) I.P.C. and section 7/8 POCSO Act and section 3(2)(VA) SC/ST Act, P.S. Jamalpur, district Mirzapur be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned and also subject to prior deposit of Rs.50,000/- by way of Fixed Deposit Receipt or as the case may be, in the court concerned (payable in court's name), to be invested in a nationalized bank and ultimately paid to the person concerned occasioned to wrongful loss on the satisfaction of court concerned.
1. The applicant will continue to attend and co-operate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.
2. He will not tamper with the witnesses.
3. He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.
It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 29.5.2018 Faridul
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Pradeep vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 May, 2018
Judges
  • Vivek Kumar Singh
Advocates
  • Dhirendra Kumar Srivastava