Court No. - 86
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 905 of 2021 Revisionist :- Pradeep Kumar Yadav (Minor) Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Amit Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Umesh Kumar,J.
This revision is directed against the order dated 31.10.2020 passed by learned Additional District Judge/ Special Judge POCSO Act, Basti, in Criminal Appeal No. 15 of 2020 and the order dated 28.8.2020 passed by Juvenile Justice Board, Basti in Case Crime No.43 of 2020 under Sections 363, 366A, 343, 368, 376D I.P.C., and 5/6 POCSO Act, Police Station-
Sonha, District- Basti, whereby the application for bail of the revisionist, Pradeep Kumar Yadav was rejected.
The revisionist is an accused in the aforesaid criminal case and he was declared juvenile by the Board in conflict with law. The application for bail moved on behalf of the revisionist was rejected by the Board vide order dated 28.8.2020 on the ground that his release on bail is likely to bring him into association with any unknown criminal or expose him to moral, physical or psychological danger or that his release would defeat the ends of justice. Being aggrieved the revisionist preferred an appeal before learned Additional District Judge/ Special Judge POCSO Act, Basti which was rejected vide order dated 31.10.2020, hence this revision.
Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned AGA for the State and perused the impugned orders as well as material placed on record.
Learned counsel for the revisionist submitted that the name of the revisionist first time came in the present case in the statement of victim under Section 164 Cr.P.C., which was recorded after two months of incident. It is further argued that the Board as well as the appellate Court rejected the bail application on the basis of surmises and conjecture whereas the report of District Probation Officer was contrary. Both the orders are based on the gravity of the offence though the object of Section 12 of the Act is totally otherwise. There was nothing on record to bring the case of the revisionist within the purview of any of the exceptions provided in Section 12 of the Act.
The bail application of Juvenile has to be decided in accordance with the provisions of section 12 of the Act which reads as follows:
12. Bail of juvenile. - (1) When any person accused of a bailable or non- bailable offence, and apparently a juvenile, is arrested or detained or appears or is brought before a Board, such person shall, notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) or in any other law for the time being in force, be released on bail with or without surety [or placed under the supervision of a Probation Officer or under the care of any fit institution or fit person] but he shall not be so released if there appear reasonable grounds for believing that the release is likely to bring him into association with any known criminal or expose him to moral, physical or psychological danger or that his release would defeat the ends of justice.
The aforesaid provision provides that a juvenile accused has to be released on bail unless there are reasonable grounds for believing that the release is likely to bring him into association with any known criminal or expose him to moral, physical or psychological danger or that his release would defeat the ends of justice. No such report was filed by the Probation Officer or the police so as to bring the case of the revisionist within the exceptions provided in Section 12 of the Act.The report of the District Probation Officer was only to the effect that the parents of the revisionist have no control over the accused-revisionist and he requires proper guidance and supervision There is nothing on record to show that the revisionist would come in association with any known criminal or his release would expose him to moral, physical or psychological danger. There is also nothing on record to show that the release of the revisionist on bail would defeat the ends of justice. The gravity of the offence is not a relevant consideration for grant of bail to a juvenile.
In these circumstances, the Board was not justified in rejecting the bail application of the revisionist.
Learned Sessions Judge has also not considered the provisions of Section 12 of the Act in proper perspective. Thus, both the impugned orders are not sustainable and are liable to be set-aside.
Revision is allowed. The impugned order dated 31.10.2020 passed by learned Additional District Judge/ Special Judge POCSO Act, Basti, in Criminal Appeal No. 15 of 2020 and the order dated 28.8.2020 passed by Juvenile Justice Board, Basti in Case Crime No.43 of 2020 under Sections 363, 366A, 343, 368, 376D I.P.C., and 5/6 POCSO Act, Police Station-
Sonha, District- Basti are set aside.
Let the revisionist- Pradeep Kumar Yadav involved in Case Crime No.43 of 2020 under Sections 363, 366A, 343, 368, 376D I.P.C., and 5/6 POCSO Act, Police Station- Sonha, District- Basti be released on bail subject to executing a personal bond by his mother (natural guardian) with two solvent/reliable sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Juvenile Justice Board, Basti subject to the following conditions:
(i) that the natural guardian/mother will furnish an undertaking that upon release on bail the juvenile will not be permitted to come into contact or association with any known criminal or be exposed to any moral, physical or psychological danger and further that the father will ensure that the juvenile will not repeat the offence.
(ii) that the father will further furnish an undertaking to the effect that the juvenile will be placed in a school and encouraged to his studies and not allowed to waste his time in unproductive and mere recreational pursuits.
(iii) The Juvenile- Pradeep Kumar and his mother will report to the District Probation Officer, Basti on the first Monday of every month with effect from the first Monday of the month next after release from custody, and, if during any calendar month the first Monday falls on a holiday then on the following working day.
(iv) The District Probation Officer will keep strict vigil on the activities of the revisionist and regularly draw up his social investigation report that would be submitted to the Juvenile Justice Board, Basti on such periodical basis as the Juvenile Justice Board determines.
Order Date :- 29.9.2021//Fhd