IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No.33810/2014(GM-RES) BETWEEN:
PRABHUKUMAR SOMASHEKAR PURANIKMATH S/O SOMASHEKAR PURANIKMATH AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS NO.240/74, VIVEKANAND NAGAR GADAG-582101.
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. SYED AKBAR PASHA, ADV.) AND:
SMT. DIVYA.S W/O PRABHUKUMAR SOMASHEKAR PURANIKMATH AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS R/AT #3,6TH MAIN, VINAYAKA LAYOUT DODDANAKUNDI EXTENSION CHINNAPANAHALLI, MARATHAHALLI POST BANGALORE-560037.
… RESPONDENT (BY SRI. DR. SUNIL SHASTRY, ADV.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER IN CRL.MISC.97/14 PASSED BY THE III ADDL. MMTC DT.11.07.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE-E AND FURTHER PLEASED TO DIRECT THE LEARNED MAGISTRATE TO GIVE THE COPY OF PROTECTION OFFICER REPORT TO THE PETITIONER AND OPPORTUNITY TO FILE OBJECTIONS & ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo stating that petition does not survive for consideration and hence, he may be permitted to withdraw the petition.
Memo is placed on record.
In view of the memo filed, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE DM