IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 24TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.83 OF 2018 BETWEEN:
1. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1 BMTC COMPLEX, KORMANGALA, BENGALURU.
2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), BENGALURU.
...APPELLANTS (BY SRI E.I. SANMATHI, ADVOCATE) AND:
M/S. CORNERSTONE PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED I AND II FLOOR, NO.540, C.M.H. ROAD, INDIRA NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 038.
…RESPONDENT (BY SRI M. LAVA, ADVOCATE) THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 08.09.2017 PASSED IN C.O.NO.62/BANG/2014, IN ITA NO.1714/BANG/2013, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006- 2007, PRAYING THIS HON'BLE COURT TO DECIDE THE FOREGOING QUESTION OF LAW AND / OR SUCH OTHER QUESTIONS OF LAW AS MAY BE FORMULATED BY THE HON’BLE COURT AS DEEMED FIT AND SET ASIDE THE APPELLATE ORDER DATED 08.09.2017 PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘B’ BENCH, BENGALURU AS SOUGHT FOR, IN THE RESPONDENT-ASSESSEE’S CASE, IN APPEAL PROCEEDINGS IN C.O.NO.62/BANG/2014, IN ITA NO.1714/BANG/2013, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006- 2007 AND GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEF AS DEEMED FIT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
***** THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the appellants submit that the appeal is not maintainable in view of the monetary limits in terms of Circular No.17 of 2019, dated 08.08.2019, passed by Director (ITJ), Central Board Direct Taxes, New Delhi.
2. In view of the submission made, the appeal is dismissed as such.
Sd/- Sd/-
JUDGE JUDGE JJ