Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Kerala
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

P.P.Arivindakshan vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala|25 November, 2014
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The petitioner claims to be the owner of property situated in survey No.94/12 of Karumathoor Village. The petitioner has approached this Court on account of refusal to effect mutation and also accepting basic tax from the petitioner. It is submitted that on account of attachment from the civil court, the revenue officials refused to effect mutation and to accept the basic tax. The attachment by the civil court is a prohibition against alienation and does not foreclose the right of the holder of the property to pay the basic tax. The property has been transferred in favour of the petitioner pursuant to Ext.P1. The right available against to the third party to proceed against the property will not be lost on account of effecting transfer of registry or acceptance of basic tax. In view of the above, without prejudice to any person to proceed against the property, the WP(C).No.31456/2014-F.
2 2nd and 3rd respondents shall effect transfer of registry and accept basic tax from the petitioner, if otherwise it is in order.
Writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, (JUDGE) Kvs/-
// true copy //
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

P.P.Arivindakshan vs State Of Kerala

Court

High Court Of Kerala

JudgmentDate
25 November, 2014
Judges
  • A Muhamed Mustaque
Advocates
  • Sri Lal K Joseph
  • Sri
  • A A Ziyad Rahman
  • Sri
  • V S Shiraz Bava
  • Sri Joseph Kurian
  • Vallamattam