IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.29946/2019 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
M/S POWER SMART MEDIA PVT LTD., NO.150, EMBASSY POINT, 3RD FLOOR, INFANTRY ROAD, BANGALORE – 560 002, REP BY ITS BUSINESS HEAD BY NAME SRI GURU PRANESHA K., S/O LATE K. N. BHAT , AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. ... PETITIONER (By Sri MADHUSUDHAN M. N., ADV.) AND:
1. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL & ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS (SERVICE-1) VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001.
2. THE UNDER SECRETRAY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL & ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS (SERVICES-4), VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE – 560 001. ... RESPONDENTS (By Sri DINES RAO, AAG and Smt.PRATHIMA HONNAPUR, AGA.) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED:3.4.2019 PASSED BY THE R-2 AS PER ANENXURE-J AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO ISSUE AN ORDER OF PROVISIONAL PERMSSION TO THE PETITIONER FORTHWITH TO CONDUCT PROGRAMME AT PALACE GROUNDS SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS AS SCHEDULE TO BE ON 19.7.2019 TO 21.7.2019 THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Sri Madhusudan M.N., learned counsel for the petitioner.
Smt.Prathima Honnapur, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondents.
2. Petition is admitted for hearing. With consent of the parties, same is heard finally.
3. When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing the matter at some length, submits that petitioner be granted liberty to submit a representation. On the other hand, learned Additional Government Advocate fairly submitted that in case such a representation is submitted the same shall be dealt with in accordance with law.
5. In view of the submissions made and in the facts of the case, writ petition is disposed of with a direction that in case the petitioner submit A representation, the competent authority shall consider and decide the same by a speaking order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE PKS