Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Poornima And Others vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|25 March, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.1834/2018 BETWEEN:
1. SMT. POORNIMA, W/O MUNIVENKATEGOWDA, AGED 50 YEARS, R/O NO.21, 1ST MAIN, DEFENCE COLONY, BAGALAKUNTE, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU – 560 073.
2. PUNITHA, S/O MUNIVENKATEGOWDA, AGED 31 YEARS, R/O NO.21, 1ST MAIN, DEFENCE COLONY, BAGALAKUNTE, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU – 560 073.
3. VISHWANATH, S/O MURUGEGOWDA, AGED 54 YEARS, R/O NO.9, DONTHUR, KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT – 562 117.
4. NAVEEN KUMAR, S/O BOREGOWDA, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O NO.186, ANUR – I, MADDUR TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT – 571 433. (BY SRI.NITHIN R, ADV.,) ...PETITIONERS AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY – SUBRAMANYAPURA P.S., REPRESENTED BY SPP, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE – 560 001.
2. SMT. MANJULA A., W/O INDRAJEETH, MAJOR, REPORTER, PRAJA PATRIKE, NO.40, 3RD CROSS, COCONUT AVENUE, NIL, PRAJASHANTHI NEWS PAPER, JAMBUSAVARI DINNE, BENGALURU CITY – 560 078.
ALSO AT:
NO.86, KASANAV APARTMENT, JAMBUSAVARI DINNE, 3RD CROSS, BANGALORE – 560 078.
(BY SRI. S.T.NAIK, HCGP FOR R1) ...RESPONDENTS THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 05.06.2017, OF TAKING COGNIZANCE AND ISSUANCE OF PROCESS AGAINST PETITIONERS OF SUBRAMANAYAPURA POLICE STATION, FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 323, 504, 506 OF IPC AND SECTION 3(1)(xi) OF SC/ST ACT IN SPL.C.C.NO.242/2017 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND SPL. COURT FOR SC/ST CASES (CCH – 71) BANGALORE CITY AND FURTHER BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS PENDING BEFORE THE ABOVE TRIAL COURT.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo for withdrawal of the petition. Therefore, prayer sought for in the petition has rendered infructuous.
Memo is placed on record.
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE TL
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Poornima And Others vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
25 March, 2019
Judges
  • Aravind Kumar