Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Pondicherry Industrial Promotion Development & Investment Corporation Ltd vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax And Others

Madras High Court|29 June, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought in this petition has become infructuous and he has made an endorsement to that effect.
In view of the above submission and endorsement made, this petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs.
29.06.2017 gms To
1. Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax, Circle I, Pondicherry.
2. Chief Commissioner of Income-Tax, VI 124, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai – 34.
3. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-VIII, Office of the Income Tax Department, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 34.
4. Commissioner of Income Tax, Pondicherry.
http://www.judis.nic.in
5. Branch Manager, Canara Bank, N.S.C.Bose Road, Pondicherry.
W.P.No.9233 of 2004
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Pondicherry Industrial Promotion Development & Investment Corporation Ltd vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
29 June, 2017
Judges
  • M Dhandapani

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.