Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

P.Jayapaul vs T.Irudayavasan

Madras High Court|08 March, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

It is seen that when the above Appeal was listed for hearing on 06.03.2017, learned counsel for the appellants was absent and hence, the case was adjourned on 08.03.2017. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. The learned counsel for the respondent is present. N.SATHISH KUMAR,J.
jv
2. Therefore, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
08.03.2017 jv Index: Yes/No Internet:Yes/No To The Additional District Court  cum  Fast Track Court II, Salem A.S.No.144 of 2009 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

P.Jayapaul vs T.Irudayavasan

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
08 March, 2017

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.