Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Pitam Singh vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|24 December, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 5
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2398 of 2021 Petitioner :- Pitam Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Avinash Chandra Srivastava
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J.
Grievance of the petitioner is that Plot No.373, situate at Village Surirbijau Bagar, Tehsil Mant, District Mathura, which is recorded as Naveen Parti in the revenue records, was being repeatedly encroached by the villagers. Earlier when the encroachment was made by the father of the respondent no.6 an order was passed on 15.03.1991 for his eviction. Now the respondent no.6 has himself encroached the disputed land and once again encroachment proceedings under Section 67 had been initiated.
Under such circumstances, without going into the merits of the case, it is being directed that the proceedings which had been initiated being Case No.169 of 2020, Computerized No.T201901500404592 be concluded within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment.
However, the court is of the view that the Gaon Sabha should be more vigilant to see that its own property is not encroached again and again.
With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 24.12.2021 Nitendra
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Pitam Singh vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
24 December, 2021
Judges
  • Siddhartha Varma
Advocates
  • Amit Kumar Pandey