IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No.46954 OF 2013 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
MR. PIOTR GRABINSKI, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, S/O. MR. MAREK, C/O. A. MUGONI, NO.13, ANNAIAPPA LAYOUT, 80 FEET ROAD, 6TH B CROSS, RAJMAHAL VILAS EXTENSION, 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU-560 094. (BY SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADV.,) AND:
1. UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS, NORTH BLOCK, RASINA HILLS, NEW DELHI BY ITS SECRETARY, DELHI-110 022.
2. FOREIGNERS REGIONAL, REGISTRATION OFFICER, B.O.I, BENGALURU-560 092.
... PETITIONER ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.V. CHANDRASHEKARA REDDY, ADV.) 2 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION OF THE PETITIONER FOR EXTENSION OF HIS VISA WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE-B.
THIS WP COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo stating that the writ petition has become infructuous.
The memo is placed on record.
Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE VBS