Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Pintu Singh And Others vs State Of Up And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 March, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 5
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11072 of 2018 Petitioner :- Pintu Singh And 7 Others Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Arun Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J.
Heard Shri Manoj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Arun Kumar Srivastava, for respondent no.4 and the learned standing counsel.
This writ petition has been filed against the orders dated 22.12.2017 and 18.8.2017 cancelling the patta of the petitioners.
The findings recorded by the appellate authorities are that there was no clear notice under Rule 173 of U.P.Z.A.&L.R Rules from the date of proclamation and the date of meeting which learned counsel for the petitioners is unable to controvert, coupled with the fact that this court in Shobha Ram vs. State of U.P 2004(2)R.D 178 and Moinuddin vs Board of Revenue, U.P, Allahabad 2002(93) RD 648 has held that the conditions provided under Rule 173 are mandatory, breach thereof renders the lease as illegal.
No good ground is made out to entertain this petition.
The writ petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 28.3.2018 RS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Pintu Singh And Others vs State Of Up And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 March, 2018
Judges
  • Pankaj Naqvi
Advocates
  • Manoj Kumar