Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Pinki vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 July, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 65
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 19213 of 2021 Applicant :- Pinki Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Dharmendra Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ram Krishna Gautam,J.
Heard over bail application moved by applicant, Pinki, in Case Crime No. 237 of 2020, under Section 306 IPC, Police Station- Kotwali Nagar, District- Aligarh.
Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused- applicant is innocent; she has been falsely implicated in this very case crime number and is languishing in jail since 30.10.2020; she is of no criminal antecedent and there is no likelihood of fleeing from course of justice or tempering with evidence in case of release on bail. Husband Ikbal, against whom accusation of abatement is there, has been enlarged on bail in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 1920 of 2021 vide order dated 18.3.2021 by the coordinate Bench of this Court. Accusation against the applicant is limited to this extent that she was in illicit relation with Ikbal, whereas it was baseless accusation, no accusation of abatement to commit suicide is there. Hence, bail has been prayed for.
Learned AGA has vehemently opposed, but could not oppose this fact that the applicant is of no criminal antecedent; co- accused has already been enlarged on bail, as above.
Having heard and gone through materials placed on record, considering all above facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima facie case, but, without commenting on merits of the case, a case for bail is made out.
Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant, Pinki , involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on her executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties, each, in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence.
2. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity.
3. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial.
4. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless her personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned.
5. The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court, Allahabad.
6. The computer generated copy of such order shall be self attested by counsel of the party concerned.
7. The concerned Court/ Authority/ Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court, Allahabad, and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel her bail.
Order Date :- 29.7.2021 Dhirendra/
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Pinki vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 July, 2021
Judges
  • Ram Krishna Gautam
Advocates
  • Dharmendra Kumar Mishra