Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Telangana
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

Pillamgolla Ranga Rao vs Arja Lakshmi Manohari W/O Babu And Others

High Court Of Telangana|09 June, 2014
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

(SHOW CAUSE NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FOURTEEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR CRL.P.No.948 of 2014 Between:
Pillamgolla Ranga Rao s/o Somaiah Petitioner/Defacto Complainant AND
1. Arja Lakshmi Manohari W/o Babu Rao, R/o. 2-167/2, Poranki Village, Vijayawada Rural, Krishna District
2. Kona Krishna Kumari W/o Venkateswara Rao, R/o 2-153, Poranki Village, Vijayawada Rural, Krishna District Respondents/Petitioners/Accused 2 & 3
3. The State of Andhra Pradesh, through SHO, Eluru I Town P.S., West Godavari District, rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Hyderabad.
Respondent/Complainant Whereas the Petitioner above named through his Advocate Sri K.Satyanarayana Murthy, presented this petition under Section 439 (2) of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the pre-arrest bail granted in favour of the respondents 1 and 2 herein (accused Nos. 2 & 3 in Cr. No. 54 of 2013 of Eluru Town Police Station), vide order in Crl.M.P. No.23 of 2014 by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, West Godavari Division at Eluru, dated: 18-1-2014.
And whereas the High Court, upon perusing the petition and memorandum of grounds filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri K.Satyanarayana Murthy, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Public Prosecutor for Respondent No.3, directed issue of notice to the Respondents No.1 & 2, herein to show cause as to why this petition should not be admitted;
You viz:
1. Arja Lakshmi Manohari W/o Babu Rao, R/o. 2-167/2, Poranki Village, Vijayawada Rural, Krishna District
2. Kona Krishna Kumari W/o Venkateswara Rao, R/o 2-153, Poranki Village, Vijayawada Rural, Krishna District are directed to show cause as to why in the circumstances set out in this petition (copy enclosed) this Criminal Petition should not be admitted.
The Court further made the following Order:
“Issue notice to respondents No.1 and 2. Post after four weeks.”
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To
1. The II Additional District and Sessions Judge, West Godavari District, at Eluru
2. The Station House Officer, Eluru I Town Police Station, West Godavri District
3. Arja Lakshmi Manohari W/o Babu Rao, R/o. 2-167/2, Poranki Village, Vijayawada Rural, Krishna District
4. Kona Krishna Kumari W/o Venkateswara Rao, R/o 2-153, Poranki Village, Vijayawada Rural, Krishna District (Addressees 3 & 4 BY RPAD alongwith a copy of Petition and memorandum of grounds)
5. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad(OUT)
6. One CC to Sri K.Satyanarayana Murthy, Advocate (OPUC)
7. One Spare copy.
HIGH COURT DR.KGSJ DATE: 06-2-2014 NOTE: POST AFTER FOUR WEEKS NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION CRL.P. NO. 948 OF 2014
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Pillamgolla Ranga Rao vs Arja Lakshmi Manohari W/O Babu And Others

Court

High Court Of Telangana

JudgmentDate
09 June, 2014
Judges
  • K G Shankar