Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

.. Petitioner vs .

Madras High Court|17 November, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

When the matter came up before this Court on 16.11.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, it was adjourned today i.e., 17.11.2017 under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 23.10.2017 ub M.V.MURALIDARAN, J.
ub To The learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Chengalpet.
CRP.No.2258 of 2005 17.11.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

.. Petitioner vs .

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
17 November, 2017

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.