Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

.. Petitioner vs .

Madras High Court|01 February, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

When the matter came up before this Court on 10.01.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, it was adjourned today i.e., 01.02.2017 under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Consequently Connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.
01.02.2017 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No ub To
1.The VIII Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai.
2The XVI Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai.
CRP(PD).No.2909 of 2013 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

.. Petitioner vs .

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
01 February, 2017

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.