Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Perumal vs Rajan And Others

Madras High Court|27 February, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

It is represented by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the suit itself was disposed of. Therefore, nothing survives in the Civil revision petition. Hence, the prayer in the civil revision petition has become infructuous.
2.Recording the said submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as one having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
27.02.2017 vs Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No To
1. The Subordinate Court, Mettur.
2. The District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Omalur.
C.R.P(PD)No.3589 of 2013 and
M.P.No.1 of 2013
http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Perumal vs Rajan And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
27 February, 2017
Judges
  • M V Muralidaran