Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Peepal Singh @ Pipal Singh vs State Of U.P.

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|13 January, 2021

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Heard Sri Dharmendra Kumar Trivedi, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Alok Saran, learned AGA, appearing for the State and perused the material brought on record.
It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. It is next contended that the applicant is Driver of the vehicle in question and has nothing to do with loaded illegal liquor. It is further submitted that in the instant case is at the most is a case of Excise Duty Evasion, as the alleged liquor which is alleged to have been recovered from the vehicle in question has neither been claimed nor found as noxious or spurious. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 7.3.2020. It has been pointed out that the applicant has no criminal history.
Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer.
Having heard the submissions of learned counsel of both sides, nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, reformative theory of punishment, and larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India, the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh v. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 2 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a case of bail.
Let applicant- Peepal Singh @ Pipal Singh, be released on bail in Case Crime No.51 of 2020, under Sections- 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC & Section 60, 72 of U.P. Excise Act, Police Station- Mohanganj, District- Amethi, on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-
1. The applicant will attend and co-operate the trial proceedings pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.
2. He will not tamper with the witnesses.
3. He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
It is clarified that the observations, if any, made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of this bail application and must not be construed to have any reflection on the ultimate merits of the case.
Order Date :- 13.1.2021 Dev Prakash.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Peepal Singh @ Pipal Singh vs State Of U.P.

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
13 January, 2021
Judges
  • Vivek Kumar Singh