Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

P.Bava Bakrudeen vs The Commissioner

Madras High Court|12 September, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

It is represented by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the writ petition has become infractuous.
2.Recording the said submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.
To
1.The Commissioner, Prohibition and Excise, Chepauk, Chennai-5.
2.The Joint Commissioner-II, Office of Prohibition and Excise, Chepauk, Chennai-5.
3.The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul.
4.The Assistant Commissioner (Excise), Office of the Collectorate, Velunachiyar Vallzhagam, Dindigul. .
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

P.Bava Bakrudeen vs The Commissioner

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
12 September, 2017

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.