Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Pavamana Credit Co Operative Society Ltd vs The Cooperative Development Officer Bangalore And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|31 October, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.51048/2012(CS-RES) BETWEEN :
PAVAMANA CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD NO.51, SRIMAN MADHWA SANGHA COMPOUND, 5TH MAIN ROAD, CHAMARAJPET BANGALORE-560 018 BY ITS SECRETARY T. VISHWANATH S/O T. GUNDU RAO AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS ... PETITIONER (BY SRI M.V. HIREMATH, ADVOCATE) AND :
1. THE COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT OFFICER BANGALORE SOUTH 8TH CROSS, MARGOSA ROAD, MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE-560 003 2. C.H. REVANNA S/O LATE CHIKKATHAYAPPA 326, SRIRAMNAGAR ROAD, KAMAKSHIPALYA BANGALORE – 560 009 3. K. BALAKRISHNA S/O KARIYALLAPPA NO.22, MUDDANNA ROAD KAMAKSHIPALYA BANGALORE- 560 009 4. H.V SUBBANNA NO.23, 1ST " D " MAIN 12TH CROSS, KENGERI SATELLITE TOWN, BANGALORE-560 060 5. SALE OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES 2ND ZONE, NO.148, 3RD MAIN ROAD, 8TH CROSS, MARGOSA ROAD, MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE-560 003 6. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ALI ASKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI K.G.SADASHIVAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3 SRI LAKSHMINARAYAN, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR R1, R5 AND R6 VIDE ORDER DATED 03.06.2013, PETITION AGAINST R4 IS DISMISSED AS NOT PRESSED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT No.5 TO ISSUE FRESH SALE PROCLAMATION OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY SO AS TO RECOVER THE AWARD AMOUNT OF Rs.15,72,565/- ALONG WITH AN INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 13.5 PER CENT WITH EFFECT FROM 28.12.2006 FORTHWITH AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo stating that the writ petition has become infructuous in view of the fact that the loan transaction inter se amongst respondent Nos.2 to 4 is settled.
2. Memo is taken on record.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE sma
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Pavamana Credit Co Operative Society Ltd vs The Cooperative Development Officer Bangalore And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
31 October, 2017
Judges
  • S N Satyanarayana