Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Parvathi W/O Puttaswamy vs Sri Ramachandra And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|19 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO.31921/2017 (GM - CPC) BETWEEN:
SMT. PARVATHI W/O. PUTTASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT UTTARADI MATA, SRIRANGA PATNA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT – 571 401. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI V.R. SARATHY, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. SRI RAMACHANDRA S/O. CHIKKABOMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/AT NO.184, 6TH CROSS, HALAHALLI, MANDYA CITY – 571 401.
2. SMT. SUNDARAMMA W/O SHIVANANJU, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT 5TH CROSS, HOSAHALLI, MANDYA CITY – 571 401.
3. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA W/O. LATE PUTTAMADAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT NYARAKAYATHANAHALLI, T. NARASIPURA TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT 571 401.
4. MISS. SAVITHA AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, D/O. SHIVANANJU, R/AT NO.1795, 5TH CROSS, HOSAHALLI, MANDYA CITY – 571 401.
5. SRI SWAMY H.S.
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, S/O. LATE SHIVANANJU, R/AT NO.1795, 5TH CROSS, HOSAHALLI, MANDAY CITY – 571 401.
6. SRI SRIDHARA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, S/O. LATE SHIVANANJU, R/AT NO.1795, 5TH CROSS, HOSAHALLI, MANDAY CITY – 571 401. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI NATARAJU V., ADVOCATE FOR R-1; SRI GAURAV G.K., ADVOCATE FOR R-2, R-5 & R-6; R-3–SERVED UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED IN I.A. FILED UNDER ORDER 9 RULE 7 OF CPC IN O.S.NO.224/2012 DATED 27.06.2017 PASSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.) AND JMFC, MANDYA (ANNEXURE-A) AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R This writ petition is filed against the order dated 27/06/2017 on I.A. in O.S.No.224/2012 on the file of Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) & JMFC at Mandya ['Trial Court' for short].
2. It is discerned that the said O.S.No.224/2012 has been disposed of by the Trial Court and hence, writ petition does not survive for consideration.
In view of the aforesaid, writ petition stands dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE S*
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Parvathi W/O Puttaswamy vs Sri Ramachandra And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
19 February, 2019
Judges
  • S Sujatha