Mr.S.N.Parthasarathi, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents 1 to 3. By consent, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.
2. The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to issue a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on the representation dated 14.03.2016 submitted by her, in accordance with law, within a time frame.
3. Mr.Govi Ganesan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that inspite of the petitioner's representation dated 14.03.2017, the 1st respondent has not passed any order so far.
4. Mr.S.N.Parthasarathi, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 submitted that the 1st respondent may be directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 14.03.2016, and pass orders in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks, after giving notice to all the interested parties.
5. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 14.03.2016 and pass orders in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after giving notice to all the interested parties.
With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
19.09.2017 rg To
1 The District Revenue Officer Krishnagiri District Krishnagiri
2 The Sub Collector Hosur Krishnagiri District
3 Tahsildar Taluk Office Krishnagiri District M. DURAISWAMY,J.
rg
W.P.No.25001 of 2017
19.09.2017