Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Parmatma Prasad vs Civil Judge

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|06 January, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 10
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4414 of 2020 Petitioner :- Parmatma Prasad Respondent :- Civil Judge(Junior Division) And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Tripathi B.G. Bhai,Pramod Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice need not be issued to respondents.
After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner confines his prayer only to the effect that only application for interim injunction 6C be decided. It is argued that the interim protection is urgently required and prays for early disposal of the stay application.
In the facts and circumstances of the case and without entering into merits of the case, the present petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is disposed of directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Khalilabad at Basti to pass appropriate orders on the application 6C filed by the petitioner expeditiously and preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a self attested computer generated copy of this order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad but certainly after giving opportunity to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties, if there is no legal impediment.
Order Date :- 6.1.2021 saqlain
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Parmatma Prasad vs Civil Judge

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
06 January, 2021
Judges
  • Prakash Padia
Advocates
  • Tripathi B G Bhai Pramod Kumar Singh