Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Paravakottai Sri Rajagopalachariar S/O Sri Varadachariar vs 1 Sri A Anantha Narasimhan

Madras High Court|05 September, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05.09.2017 CORAM:
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN C.S. No. 602 of 2017 Paravakottai Sri Rajagopalachariar S/o Sri Varadachariar, Trustee Srimad Andavan Poundrikapuram Swamy Ashramam Trust. Srirangam, Door No.24 20 th Cross Street, Beasant Nagar, Chennai-600 090. .. Plaintiff Vs
1 Sri. A.Anantha Narasimhan, S/o Ganapathi Ananthachar, No.33, 2nd Street, Sameerapuram Main Road, Chamrajpet, Bengaluru-560 018.
2 S.Gopalan.
S/o Sri K.Srinivasa Raghavan, Flat No.104, Vignesh Arunodhaya F Block, Melur Road Srirangam, Trichy-6.
3 Sri Ramasamy Iyengar Trustee Srimad Andavan poundrikapuram Swamy Ashramam Trust.Srirangam, New No.25, Nachiappan Street, Mahalingapuram, Chennai- 600 034.
4 Sri N.K.Ramaswamy Trustee Srimad Andavan poundrikapuram Swamy, Ashramam Trust.Srirangam, New No.25, http://www.judis.nic.in Nachiappan Street, Mahalingapuram, Chennai- 600 034.
5 Dr.S.Parthasarathi, Door No.24 20 th Cross Street, Beasant Nagar, Chennai-600 090. .. Defendants For Plaintiff : M/s.C.Umashankar For Defendant-1 : Mr.S.Parthasarathy, Senior Counsel for M/s.R.Ragavan For Defendant-2 : M/s. N. Jayakumar For Defendant-5 : M/s.P. Dinesh Kumar PRAYER : Plaint has been filed Under Order IV Rule 1 of O.S. Rules read with Order VII, Rule 1 of Civil Procedure code, (a) Permanent Injunction restraining the defendants, their men, Agents or their representatives or any one claiming under them or acting on their behalf from anyway deal with affairs of the trust., viz, SRIMAD ANDAVAN POUNDRIKAPURAM SWAMY ASHRAMAM TRUST.
SRIRANGAM" either by operating its Bank Accounts belonging to " SRIMAD ANDAVAN POUNDRIKAPURAM SWAMY ASHRAMAM TRUST.
SRIRANGAM" or with its properties of trust without proper authority as envisaged in the trust deed dated 29.07.1995 (b). directing the defendants, jointly and severelly to pay the cost of the suit.
J U D G M E N T A memo has been filed by the learned counsel for the plaintiff.
http://www.judis.nic.in
2. The memo is recorded. The learned counsel for the plaintiff has made an endorsement in the plaint is as follows;
"Memo filed. Suit may kindly be dismissed as withdrawn.
Court fee may kindly be refunded"
3. To that effect, the suit in C.S.No.602 of 2017 is dismissed as withdrawn.
05.09.2017 Index : Yes / No Web : Yes / No ksa Office to note : Issue order copy on 06.09.2017 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J ksa Judgment in C.S. No. 602 of 2017 05.09.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Paravakottai Sri Rajagopalachariar S/O Sri Varadachariar vs 1 Sri A Anantha Narasimhan

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
05 September, 2017
Judges
  • C V Karthikeyan