Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Paras Nath Yadav vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 October, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 52
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 18069 of 2021 Applicant :- Paras Nath Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Ramesh Kumar Pandey,Rahul Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
Heard Sri Ramesh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Satish Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the State and perused the record.
The anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant Paras Nath Yadav, seeking anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest in Case Crime No.129 of 2021, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC and 3, 5A, 5B and 8 The U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, u/s 11 of Prevention of Cruelty to Animal AAct, 1960, P.S. Pannuganj, District Sonbhadra.
Learned counsel for the applicant argued that as the applicant could not fulfill the illegal demand of the police personnel, he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is alleged that he had changed the registration plate of the vehicle in question and animals were being transported on the said vehicles which was apprehended and then chassis number which was inquired and found that the registration number of the vehicle is different as that of the number plate which is affixed on it. The applicant is the owner of the said vehicle. The applicants have no criminal history as stated in para no.21 of the affidavit.
Per contra learned counsel for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail. The allegation against the applicant are serious in nature. The present case is a case in which the applicant is involved.
After having heard the learned counsel for the parties, it is evident that the allegation against the applicant are serious in nature.
The present anticipatory bail application is rejected.
The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad, self attested by the applicant(s) along with a self attested identity proof of the said person(s) (preferably Aadhar Card) mentioning the mobile number(s) to which the said Aadhar Card is linked.
The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
(Samit Gopal, J.) Order Date :- 28.10.2021/Gaurav
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Paras Nath Yadav vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 October, 2021
Judges
  • Samit Gopal
Advocates
  • Ramesh Kumar Pandey Rahul Mishra