Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Paramhans vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|23 December, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 64
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33206 of 2021 Applicant :- Paramhans Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Manish Kumar,Manoj Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Arun Kumar Yadav
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
1. List has been revised. None has appeared on behalf of the informant.
2. Heard Sri Manish Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant; Sri Janardan Prakash, learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.
3. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant - Paramhans with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. - 0081 of 2021, under Sections - 498A, 304-B I.P.C. and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station - Dankaur, District - Gautam Buddha Nagar, during pendency of trial.
4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, at present:
(i) against FIR lodged on 16.3.2021, the applicant is in confinement since 17.3.2021.
(ii) the applicant claims to have cooperated in the investigation. In any case he is not shown to have unduly evaded arrest.
(iii) the applicant has no criminal history.
(iv) chargesheet has already been submitted yet trial has not commenced. Therefore, there is no hope of early conclusion of the trial.
(v) on prima facie basis, only for purpose of grant of bail, it has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the occurrence was purely suicidal; in that regard reference has been made to the post mortem report; it has been submitted that the body of the deceased was recovered from a room locked from inside; independent witnesses have not supported the allegation of demand dowry or cruelty practiced; there are two children born from the marriage who are infants.
(vi) in any case, no reasonable apprehension has been brought to the fore by the State that the applicant, if enlarged on bail would either tamper with the evidence or delay the trial.
5. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the final merits of the case, let the applicant involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:-
(i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/pressuring the witness, during the investigation or trial.
(ii) The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.
(iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
6. In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, the bail being granted shall be cancelled.
7. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.
Order Date :- 23.12.2021 Faraz
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Paramhans vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
23 December, 2021
Judges
  • Saumitra Dayal Singh
Advocates
  • Manish Kumar Manoj Kumar