Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application No. 132991 of 2014 Heard Shri Devendra Dahma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Shailendra Singh for the respondents. No counter affidavit has been filed to the affidavit filed in support of the delay condonation application. I have perused the affidavit filed in support of the delay condonation application. Cause shown for the delay is found to be sufficient. Delay in filing the substitution application is condoned. The delay condonation application is allowed. Order Date :- 24.4.2014 Priyanka Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 12207 of 1990 Petitioner :- Param Hans Respondent :- The Asst. Director Of Consolidation & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- H.S.N. Tripathi,Devendra Dahma Counsel for Respondent :- S.C.,R.C. Singh,Shailendra Singh Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J.
Civil Misc. Substitution Application No. 132992 of 2014 Heard.
Substitution application is allowed. Order Date :- 24.4.2014 Priyanka Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 12207 of 1990 Petitioner :- Param Hans Respondent :- The Asst. Director Of Consolidation & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- H.S.N. Tripathi,Devendra Dahma Counsel for Respondent :- S.C.,R.C. Singh,Shailendra Singh Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J.
Civil Misc. Abatement Application No. 17767 of 2014 Since the substitution application of the respondent no. 3 has been allowed. The abatement application is accordingly dismissed. Order Date :- 24.4.2014 Priyanka