Court No. - 45
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32683 of 2018 Applicant :- Pappu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Dileep Singh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
The argument is that the applicant is not named in the first information report. His named has surfaced in the statement of the co-accuseds Mannu and Ram Awatar, who have already been enlarged on bail by the court below along with two other co-accuseds.The applicant has no previous criminal history and he has subsequently been implicated in one case. The applicant is in jail since 18.11.2017.
On the other hand learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail.
Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another reported in (2018)3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant Pappu involved in Case Crime No.657 of 2014, under Sections 399, 402 IPC, Police Station Kannauj, District- Kannauj be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which they are accused, or suspected of the commission of which they are suspected.
5. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the complainant is free to move an application for cancellation of bail before this court.
Order Date :- 28.8.2018 SS