Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Pappu vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 September, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1613 of 2018
Appellant :- Pappu
Respondent :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Appellant :- Dinesh Kumar Singh,Sushil Kumar Pandey
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Atul Kumar
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh-I,J.
Ref: Order on Criminal Misc. (Correction) Application No.9 of 2019 Heard Sri Sushil Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Irshad Hussain, learned AGA for the State.
Sri Atul Kumar, learned counsel for the complainant is not present though a copy of the correction application has been served to him, as it appears from the application itself.
This is an application for correction of the order dated 01.08.2019.
Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that on 01.11.2018 this Court granted bail to applicants but in the said order, Section 148 I.P.C. has been left out, as it has also not mentioned in the memo of appeal as well as in the bail application.
Learned counsel for the appellant is permitted to make necessary correction in the memo of appeal as well as in the bail application.
The correction application is allowed.
The aforesaid order is corrected as follows:
Let the words "Section 148 I.P.C." be added in para 6 of the order dated 01.11.2018 and also the same be corrected in the memo of appeal as well as in the bail application.
Order Date :- 27.9.2019 Nitin Verma
(Dinesh Kumar Singh-I, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.) Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1613 of 2018
Appellant :- Pappu
Respondent :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Appellant :- Dinesh Kumar Singh,Sushil Kumar Pandey
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Atul Kumar
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh-I,J.
Ref: Order on Criminal Misc. (Correction) Application No.10 of 2019 Heard Sri Sushil Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Irshad Hussain, learned AGA for the State.
Sri Atul Kumar, learned counsel for the complainant is not present though the correction application has been served to him.
Learned counsel for the appellant states that he had earlier moved a correction application in the present appeal on behalf of the applicant- Pappu and Muzammil for correcting the order dated 01.11.2018 but the same could not be traced out, hence, he moved the present correction application. But today it appears from the record that earlier filed correction application has been traced out, hence, the same has been heard and disposed of today.
Accordingly, the present correction application is dismissed as not pressed.
Order Date :- 27.9.2019 Nitin Verma
(Dinesh Kumar Singh-I, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Pappu vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 September, 2019
Judges
  • Ramesh Sinha
Advocates
  • Dinesh Kumar Singh Sushil Kumar Pandey