Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Pappu vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 September, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 79
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34605 of 2021 Applicant :- Pappu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Tahir Ali Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajiv Joshi,J.
Heard Sri Tahir Ali, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 812 of 2020 under Sections 307, 332, 353 I.P.C. and Section 3/5A/8 Cow Slaughter (Prevention) Act, police station Kokhraj, District Kaushambi during pendency of trial.
It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has falsely implicated in the present case. The First Information Report was lodged against eight accused persons. The applicant is not named in the First Information Report. His name surfaced on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Bharat Lal Maurya. It is further contended that other co-accused, namely, Aslam, Mubarak Ali and Bharat Lal Maurya, have already been enlarged on bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 6769 of 2021, 6195 of 2021 and 8212 of 2021 vide orders dated 01.02.2021, 08.02.2021 and 17.02.2021 copies of which are appended as annexure-3 to the bail application. The case of the applicant stands on better footing, hence the applicant is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity. The applicant is in jail since 05.08.2021 having one criminal history, i.e., Case Crime No.
550 of 2020 under Sections 3/5A/5B/8 Cow Slaughter (Prevention) Act, police station Kokhraj, District Kaushambi as stated paragraph-10 of the affidavit filed in support of the bail application. In the said case, the applicant has been granted bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 34575 of 2021 vide order dated 17.09.2021 and if he is released on bail, there is no chance of his absconding or misusing the liberty of bail or tampering with the prosecution witnesses.
Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by learned counsel for the applicant.
Having heard the submissions of learned counsel of both sides, nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, reformative theory of punishment, and larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India, the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh v. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 2 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a case of bail.
Let the applicant, Pappu who is involved in aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.
1. The applicant will attend and co-operate the trial proceedings pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.
2. He will not tamper with the witnesses.
3. He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.
The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by the court concerned and in case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.
It is clarified that the observations, if any, made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of this bail application and must not be construed to have any reflection on the ultimate merits of the case.
In case of breach of of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.
The computer generated copy of such order shall be self attested by the counsel of the party concerned.
The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 27.9.2021/Shiraz
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Pappu vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 September, 2021
Judges
  • Rajiv Joshi
Advocates
  • Tahir Ali