Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Panni Lal vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|21 June, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 46
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 25044 of 2019 Applicant :- Panni Lal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Vikas Rana Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Umesh Kumar,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A and gone through the record.
This bail application has been moved on behalf of accused- applicant- Panni Lal, who is involved in case crime no.1093 of 2017 under Sections 452, 376, 511, 354-D, 323, 395, 506 I.P.C.
and Section 4 POCSO Act, Police Station-Baradari, District- Bareilly.
Submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that in the similar set of facts, in respect to the same occurrence, all the co- accused, almost with similar roles, except the present applicant have already been granted bail by co-ordinate Benches of this Court, copies of the bail orders have collectively been annexed at annexure-9 to this application; submission is that applicant is also entitled for bail. It is lastly contended that the accused applicant is languishing in jail since 3.4.2019.
Learned A.G.A has opposed the prayer for bail. However granting bail to co-accused person and parity has not been disputed.
Learned A.G.A has opposed the prayer for bail.
Keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and without touching the merits of the case in my opinion the accused applicant is entitled for bail.
Let the above named applicant involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:-
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence, shall cooperate in investigation or trial and shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
2. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.
Order Date :- 21.6.2019//Fhd.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Panni Lal vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
21 June, 2019
Judges
  • Umesh Kumar
Advocates
  • Vikas Rana