Court No. - 40
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1004 of 2019 Petitioner :- Panna Lal Respondent :- Virendra Kumar And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Lal Ji Maurya,Vinod Kumar
Hon'ble Anil Kumar,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
As the controversy involved in the present case is trivial in nature, so the present writ petition is finally heard and decided at the admission stage.
Accordingly, notices to opposite parties are dispensed with.
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner has filed a civil suit registered as Civil Suit No. 105 of 2016 (Panna Lal Vs. Virendra Kumar and others) in which he has moved an application for interim injunction registered as paper No. 6-C but the same has not been decided till date on one or other pretext without any fault on the part of the petitioner.
Accordingly, he requests that respondent No. 5/Civil Judge (Jr.Div.), Garvi, Allahabad may be directed to decide the application No. 6 C for interim injunction moved by the petitioner in Civil Suit No. 105 of 2016 (Panna Lal Vs. Virendra Kumar and others) within stipulated time as fixed by this Court.
Thus, after hearing learned counsel for parties and going through the record as well as keeping in view the submission made by learned counsel for petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 5/Civil Judge (Jr.Div.), Garvi, Allahabad to decide the application No. 6 C for interim injunction moved by the petitioner in Civil Suit No. 105 of 2016 (Panna Lal Vs. Virendra Kumar and others) expeditiously, say, within a period of three months from the date of receiving certified copy of this order after hearing the parties concerned on merit.
It is clarified that this Court has not adjudicated the claim of the petitioner on merit.
Order Date :- 22.2.2019 Ravi/-