Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

M/S Panna Lal And Company vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|22 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 56 of 2019 Petitioner :- M/S Panna Lal And Company Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ankur Agarwal,Suyash Agarwal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.S.G.I.,Anant Kumar Tiwari Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Heard Sri Suyash Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Anant Kumar Tiwari, learned Counsel for the respondent-Union of India.
Learned Counsel for the respondent states that in compliance of the order dated 21.01.2019 the goods have been released. This fact has not been disputed by the learned Counsel for the petitioner.
In view of the above, this writ petition has become infrutuous.
It is, accordingly, dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 22.2.2019 S.P.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

M/S Panna Lal And Company vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
22 February, 2019
Judges
  • Bharati Sapru
Advocates
  • Ankur Agarwal Suyash Agarwal

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.