Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Pankaj Yadav vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 November, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 28
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35803 of 2019 Applicant :- Pankaj Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Pradeep Chauhan,Shiva Kant Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Heard Mr. Pradeep Chauhan, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for State.
The first bail application of the applicant was rejected, vide order dated 17.01.2019.
Applicant has now filed second bail application for seeking his enlargement on bail in S.T. No. 100 of 2016, arising out of Case Crime No. 233 of 2015 under Sections 498A, 304B, IPC and 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Mehnagar, District Azamgarh during the pendency of the trial.
Learned counsel for applicant submits that a period of more than 10 months has rolled by since the date of passing of order dated 17.01.2019, but the trial itself is proceedings at snail's pace, whereas there was an expectation of the Court in the aforesaid order to gear up the trial and conclude the same within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of the aforesaid order.
Perusal of the order sheet shows that trial has been adjourned on account of non appearance of one of co-accused namely Kadami Devi, who is none else, but mother of the applicant.
In view of above, no good ground is made out for enlarging the applicant on bail. Consequently, second bail application is, hereby, rejected.
Order Date :- 28.11.2019 HSM
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Pankaj Yadav vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 November, 2019
Judges
  • Rajeev Misra
Advocates
  • Pradeep Chauhan Shiva Kant Srivastava