IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF MAY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.NARENDAR W.P.No.30016/2017 (LB RES) BETWEEN 1. SIDDAPPAJI, AGED ABOUT MAJOR DODDAMMA TAHI TEMPLE, 2. MAHADEVAMMA W/O NINGARAJU AGED ABOUT MAJOR 3. HISHA W/O RAZAK PASHA AGED ABOUT MAJOR 4. RAJAMMA W/O MALAGAIAH AGED ABOUT MAJOR 5. MAHADEVAMMA W/O NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT MAJOR 6. CHIKKAARASAIAH H/O NAGAMMA AGED ABOUT MAJOR 7. PUTTAMMA W/O JAVARAIAH @ KALLURAYAIAH AGED ABOUT MAJOR 8. CHIKKAGIRIYAMMA W/O NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT MAJOR 9. SHANKAR H/O PUTTAMMA AGED ABOUT MAJOR 10. RUDRANAMMA W/O MARICHIKA AGED ABOUT MAJOR 11. MAHESH H/O CHIKKATAYAMMA AGED ABOUT MAJOR 12. MADEVI W/O VENKATESHA AGED ABOUT MAJOR 13. JAYAMMA W/O RANGASWAMY AGED ABOUT MAJOR 14. PUTTAMMA W/O MALAGAIAH AGED ABOUT MAJOR 15. NANJAMANNI, W/O LATE CHIKKAMADAIAH AGED ABOUT MAJOR 16. SUNDARAMMA W/O ARASAIAH AGED ABOUT MAJOR 17. KANAKA RATNA W/O VENKATESHA AGED ABOUT MAJOR 18. MASANAMMA W/O VENKATESH AGED ABOUT MAJOR 19. RANI, W/O SHANTHARAJU AGED ABOUT MAJOR 20. MANGALAMMA W/O VENKATACHALA AGED ABOUT MAJOR 21. VENKATESH H/O RANGAMMA AGED ABOUT MAJOR 22. PARVATHAMMA W/O RAJU AGED ABOUT MAJOR 23. MASANAMMA W/O VENKATESHA AGED ABOUT MAJOR 24. PADMAMMA W/O JAYAPPA AGED ABOUT MAJOR All RESIDING AT NEW SITE, BASAVANAGUDDE LAYOUT, TALAKADU HOBLI, T NARASIPURA TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT-571124 (ALL ARE TALAKADU VILLAGERS) ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI MANJUNATH N D, ADV. – ABSENT.) AND 1. PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER TALAKADU HOBLI T NARASIPURA TALUK MYSURU DISTRICT-571124.
2. EXECUTIVE OFFICER TALUK PANCHAYATH T NARASIPURA TALUK MYSURU DISTRICT-571124 3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MYSURU SUB DIVISION MYSURU-570001 4. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER MYSURU ZILLA PANCHAYATH MYSURU-570001 5. DISTRICT COMMISSIONER MYSURU DISTRICT-570001.
(BY SRI KIRAN KUMAR T.L, AGA.) ... RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH IN ANNEXURE-H DTD:18.5.2017 ISSUED BY THE R-1 ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER 1. This Court vide order dated 11.01.2018 had granted two weeks time as a last opportunity to remove the office objections. Despite the same, even after more than a year and half since the said order was made, office objections have not yet been complied with. Such indolence cannot be condoned.
2. Today, though the matter is called out twice, there is no representation for the petitioners. It is apparent that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. In that view of the matter, writ petition is dismissed for default and non-prosecution.
KK CT-HR Sd/- JUDGE