Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Pamil vs U P S R T C

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|31 January, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 26
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 1783 of 2005 Appellant :- Pamil Respondent :- U.P.S.R.T.C.
Counsel for Appellant :- A.L. Jaiswal,Sharve Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Mukesh Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
1. Heard Sri A.L. Jaiswal, learned counsel for appellant and Sri Mukesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for respondents and perused the record.
2. This petition has been preferred against the judgment and award dated 9.05.2005 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Additional District Judge, Court No. 17, Allahabad, whereby awarding a sum of Rs.7000/- as compensation to the claimant.
3. The matter requires consideration.
4. Going through the record, this Court has suggested to the counsel for appellant as the only question is regarding the quantum enhancement of Rs.20,000/- would be just and proper, looking to the injuries of the appellant.
5. However, it is vehementally objected by Sri Mukesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for respondent that this Court feels that Rs.20,000/- is just and proper with 9% interest from the date of filing of claim petition till judgment and award, 6% thereafter till the amount is deposited.
6. The award stands modified to the aforesaid extent. The amount be deposited by U.P.S.R.T.C. within 12 weeks from today, if the said amount is not deposited within 12 weeks, 6% be read as 9% interest.
7. The appeal is partly allowed.
Order Date :- 31.1.2019 Shubhankar
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Pamil vs U P S R T C

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
31 January, 2019
Judges
  • Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
Advocates
  • A L Jaiswal Sharve Singh