Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Pale vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 September, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 29
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3908 of 2021 Petitioner :- Pale Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shiv Kant Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Kaushalendra Nath Singh
Hon'ble Munishwar Nath Bhandari,Acting Chief Justice Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
None appears for the petitioner.
We find that the petition was not argued at any point of time as on 08.02.2021, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner though the case was called even in the second round. On 22.03.2021, it was deferred for the next date and on 23.03.2021, the counsel did not appear due to personal difficulty. Today also, none appears to press the writ petition.
Learned counsel Sri Kaushalendra Nath Singh is present for the respondent.
Even otherwise, the petitioner is said to be a subsequent purchaser in the land under acquisition.
Writ petition is however dismissed for non prosecution.
Order Date :- 30.9.2021 Madhurima (Piyush Agrawal, J.) (Munishwar Nath Bhandari, A.C.J.)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Pale vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 September, 2021
Judges
  • Piyush Agrawal
Advocates
  • Shiv Kant Mishra