Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Padmamma vs State Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|25 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA WRIT PETITION NOs.7906/2018 & 9453-9457/2018(KLR-RES) BETWEEN SMT.PADMAMMA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, W/O KRISHNAPPA D.BARANDUR VILLAGE MUGULAR POST, HOSUR TALUK KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT – 635 109 …PETITIONER (BY SRI K.N.PRAVEEN KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND :
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU – 560 001 2. THE UNDERSECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT REVENUE DEPARTMENT (LAND REVENUE) VIDHANA SOUDHA DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU – 560 001 3. THE TAHSILDAR HOSAKOTE TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT BENGALURU – 560 067. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI VENKATESH DODDERI, AGA FOR R1 TO R3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS ESPECIALLY 3RD RESPONDENT TO INCORPORATE IN INJUNCTION ORDER GRANTED BY THE 2ND ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU IN O.S.NO.1036/2016 IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATION DATED 29.1.2018 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the writ petitions as not pressed.
Memo is taken on record. Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/- JUDGE nd/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Padmamma vs State Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
25 February, 2019
Judges
  • S N Satyanarayana