Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Padam Singh vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 February, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 37
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6427 of 2018 Petitioner :- Padam Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P And 03 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Virendra Singh Tomar,Rajiv Sisodia,Virendra Singh Tomar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J.
By means of this writ petition the petitioner, who is a Lekhpal, is seeking promotion on the post of Revenue Inspector.
For entitlement and grant of promotion, the petitioner has to approach the appropriate authority, which is the Commissioner, in case the petitioner is eligible for getting promotion.
Whether there is any provsion for reservation in handicapped quota or not, it is for the authorities to look into.
The writ petition is disposed of with the observation that in case the petitioner represents to the respondent no. 2 and if there is any provision in handicapped quota for promotion and if the rules permit and the petitioner is eligible, his claim be considered and decided in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 27.2.2018 Sunil Kr. Gupta
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Padam Singh vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 February, 2018
Judges
  • Abhinava Upadhya
Advocates
  • Virendra Singh Tomar Rajiv Sisodia Virendra Singh Tomar