Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Padam Singh vs Mandaliya Sahayak Shiksha Nideshak

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 July, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8140 of 2002 Petitioner :- Padam Singh Respondent :- Mandaliya Sahayak Shiksha Nideshak (Basic) & Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Akhil Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs:
“(a) to issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents to sent the petitioner for B.T.C. training provisionally.
(b) to issue a writ order or directing the selection process adopted by respondents after 5.11.2001 by not selecting the petitioner for special B.T.C. training.”
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 26.7.2018 PS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Padam Singh vs Mandaliya Sahayak Shiksha Nideshak

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 July, 2018
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Akhil Kumar Sharma