1/3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI WRIT PETITION Nos. 46982-46983/2017 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN P. VISHALAKSHAMMA W/O S.P. SRIRAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS RESIDING AT: #68/2, H.SIDHAIAH ROAD SUDHAMANAGAR, WARD NO.48 BANGALORE – 560 027 (BY SRI AJITH P.B., ADVOCATE) ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE COMMISSIONER BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE OFFICE OF THE B.B.M.P., HUDSON CIRCLE BANGALORE – 560 001.
2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KEMPEGOWDA NAGAR SUB-DIVISION BANGALORE – 560 001.
3. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (RAJAKALUVE) BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE OFFICE OF THE B.B.M.P., HUDSON CIRCLE BANGALORE – 560 001.
4. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (CHIKPET DIVISION) BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE OFFICE OF THE B.B.M.P., HUDSON CIRCLE BANGALORE – 560 001.
...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI T.M. VENKATA REDDY, ADVOCATE) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-2 TO PASS ORDERS ON ANNEXURE–G CONSIDERING THE REPLY OF THE PETITIONER AT ANNEXURE–K DATED 10.04.2017 SUBMITTED BEFORE R-2 EXPEDITIOUSLY AND ETC.
THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Mr. Ajit P.B., Adv. for petitioner.
Mr. T.M. Venkata Reddy, Adv. for respondents.
1. The only grievance made by the petitioner in these cases is that the reply filed by the petitioner before the respondent No.2-Assistant Executive Engineer, BBMP, in response to his notice issued vide Annexure-G, dated 31.03.2017, is not being decided by him.
2. The petitions are disposed of, with a direction to the said authority to give an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and decide the said notice expeditiously, preferably with in a period of four weeks from today. The petitioner may appear before the said authority, in the first instance, on 08.11.2017.
Sd/- JUDGE mv Sl.No.46.