Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Telangana
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

P V Chary vs The Singareni Collieries Company Limited And Others

High Court Of Telangana|05 November, 2014
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.32986 of 2014 Dated: 05.11.2014 Between:
P.V. Chary .. Petitioner and The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan, Khairatabad, Hyderabad, and others.
.. Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Mr. Sai Gangadhar Chamarty Counsel for respondents 1 to 3: Mr. Nandigam Krishna Rao The court made the following:
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the deduction of the amount in the bills towards Contractor’s contribution to Employees Coal Mines Provident Fund from out of the amounts payable to the petitioner towards transportation charges under purchase order No.7600005558 dated 31-07-2014 though the provisions of the Coal Mines Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1948, are not applicable to the Transport Contractor as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the Coal Mines Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1948.”
At the hearing, it is agreed among the learned counsel for the parties that the issue raised in this writ petition is covered by common judgment dated 30-03-2011 in W.P.No.11107 of 2009 & batch, whereby this Court has disposed of those writ petitions with the following directions:
“a) The Regional Commissioner or any Officer authorized by him shall first issue a notice to the petitioners to decide whether the activity undertaken by the petitioners comes within the definition of Coal Mine. It shall be open to the petitioners to submit explanation;
b) In the event of the activity being declared as the one in coal mine, the employees shall be enrolled as members, subject to their fulfilment of the prescribed conditions, the respondents shall assign account numbers and issue cards; and the deductions shall be made with reference to the account numbers and cards so issued, periodically;
c) Till such time, no deductions shall be made, but if it is held that the petitioners are liable, at a later point of time, they shall be under obligation to pay the arrears also;
d) The amount deducted from the petitioners, so far, shall be kept in FDRs and the manner in which it shall be utilized shall be decided, depending upon the outcome of the exercise undertaken above; and
e) The authority of the coal mines provident fund shall ensure that it does not deduct any amount, without reference to a particular employee, who is admitted to the provident fund.”
In view of the same, this writ petition is also disposed of in terms of the aforesaid common judgement with the direction that the directions reproduced above shall form part of this order.
As a sequel to the disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.41243 of 2014 shall stand disposed of as infructuous.
C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 5th November, 2014
Note:-
The Registry shall record the name of Mr. Nandigam Krishna Rao as the counsel representing respondents 1 to 3 subject to his filing appearance within three days from today.
B/o IBL
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

P V Chary vs The Singareni Collieries Company Limited And Others

Court

High Court Of Telangana

JudgmentDate
05 November, 2014
Judges
  • C V Nagarjuna Reddy
Advocates
  • Mr Sai Gangadhar Chamarty