Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

P Susila And Others vs The Superintendent Of Police And Others

Madras High Court|07 November, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

It is represented by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners that in view of the subsequent development during the pendency of the writ petition, nothing survives for further consideration in this writ petition.
2. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed and endorsement was also made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
07.11.2017 Index : yes/No Internet : Yes bri To
1. The Superintendent of Police, O/o. Superintendent of Police, Cuddalore-1, Cuddalore District.
2. The Inspector of Polcie, Nellikuppam Police Station, Nellikuppam 607 105, Cuddalore District.
3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
V.PARTHIBAN,J.
bri W.P.No.7220 of 2012 07.11.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

P Susila And Others vs The Superintendent Of Police And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
07 November, 2017
Judges
  • V Parthiban